Unit of the Week - French Chasseurs-a-cheval

Prior to the Revolution, the cavalry arm of the French army had largely been recruited from the nobility. The revolution, of course, saw "the people" turn on the nobility, and those few who weren't executed on the guillotine were chased abroad. Horses too, were in short supply, as the French military had traditionally imported its horses from Germany. In the early days of the Revolution, France had few friends among the German states, and supply was therefore poor.

So, in the early stages of the Revolutionary Wars, French cavalry was less plentiful and of a lower quality than in previous years.

Initially, squadrons of chasseurs-a-cheval were raised, providing at least some light cavalry support for the revolutionary armies, forced to defend "La Balle France" against the (still royalist) superpowers of Europe, who hoped to crush the flame of revolution before it spread to their lands. These were horsemen essentially light cavalry, designed for scouting and reconnaissance, and support duties rather than heavy duty fighting.

When they did find themselves in the midst of close quarter fighting, French light cavalry discharged both pistols before turning to their swords. (Heavy cavalry didn’t bother with pistols, charging directly with the sword).

A French cavalry regiment comprised four squadrons each of 120 men (which translates to six figures in my army, which is scaled to one figure represents 20 men). In the picture above , we see "Le Petit General" himself, Napoleon Bonaparte, leading a squadron of chasseurs-a-cheval on patrol.

While in Italy, after almost being killed when the patrolling chasseurs-a-cheval that he was accompanying found themselves in the middle of Austrian positions by mistake, Napoleon Bonaparte formed a Guard Cavalry with Chasseurs-a-Cheval-de-la- Guarde comprising comprising five squadrons of Chasseurs. A sixth squadron, one of Marmelukes, was added following the Egyptian campaign of 1798-1802.

What was left of the old “heavy cavalry” of the Royalist era was reorganised in 1799 into regiments of carabinier (which tended to be elite troops) and cuirassiers.

The light cavalry (hussars, chasseurs-a-cheval and lancers) were primarily intended for reconnaissance, screening, raiding, pursuit and “field security”, although hussars were known to make massed charges on the battlefield. Hussars were a direct copy of the famous Hungarian hussars, just as (later) lancers were a copy of the Polish lancer.

Prior to 1800, the French had regarded dragoons as primarily heavy cavalry, and used them as such. Finding that he had insufficient horses to mount all his cavalry, Napoleon ordered at least some of his dragoons to be trained as the dismounted light cavalry role we know them as today.

The successful 1805-1807 campaigns against Austria and Prussia brought some relief in terms of provision of mounts. But dragoons were now officially a part of the “light cavalry”.

Celtic Village Update

It's going sloweer than I wanted, but it is moving forward.

My Celtic village progressed over the weekend with a "haystack" for the animals to feed on and also the first portions of fencing (far left) that will eventually surround it (except for a small gateway in front).

Eventually I'll get there!

Unit of the Week - Huns

The "boogie men" of dark age Europe - or so we are often led to believe.

Interestingly enough the term "Hun" was often used to refer to German soldiers during the two world wars of the 1900s.

The original Huns were believed to be one of the nomadic tribes of Asia - western China in fact, pushed west by natural immigration and conflict with rival tribes.

They arrived in Rurope and the Middle East in force however during the early 5th century. The "White Huns" invaded Iran and the Arab world, while the "Black Huns" invaded Europe from the latter part of the fourth century, forcing the Germanic people to migrate south and west, and setting off a chain reaction that led to the final collapse of the Roman Empire.

The Black Huns first defeated the Alans, who lived between the Volga and Don rivers. They then defeated the Ostrogoths and attacked the Visigoths, pushing both south. (It was the Visigoths who then overthrew the final Roman Emperor). By 420CE a large Hunnic Cobnfederacy had been formed,under King Roas (or Rugilus). It was the son of King Roas however, who was to become the most famous, and perhaps feared, of all Huns.

Attila (and his older brother Bleda) became joint kings of the Huns on the death of Roas in 435CE. Attila has been branded as the "personification of barbarism" by the history books, but he was certainly educated in Rome, reportedly spoke as many as seven different languages, and built or rebuilt more cities than he destroyed. Indeed, diplomats of the time geenrally seem "impressed" with him.

Attila did murder his brother in 445CE to become sole king, and during his lifetime, he sacked more than 70 towns. He was cruel in dealing with those who opposed him, but appears to have been as much of a "gentleman" as any of his era with those who dealt fairly with him.

The Huns themselves were primarily light cavalry, armed with bows and javelins, but their armies were supplemented by the forces of conquered or allied nations.

Attila pressed into Gaul (modern day France) in 451CE, urged by King Gaiseric of the Vandals to attack the Visigoths who had fled there from Germany, taking the circuitous route through Rome itself. The Vandals and the Visigoths had formed an alliance which didn't quite work out, and the Vandals wanted to teach the Visigoths a bit of a lesson. The Vandals stayed out of the war, but the Huns crossed the Rhhine, to take on the Visigoths, who had realigned with the Romans.

The initial Hunnic victories saw the alliance against them grow, as they pushed deeper into Gaul. Now, the remnants of the Alans and the Burgundians also joined with their traditional enemies, the Romans, to fight the new invader. The Franks, after whom France was eventually named, fought on both sides.

Finally, on the Catalonian Plains the Huns and their allies, under Attila, met an allied army of Romans, Visigoths, and their allies, at the Battle of Chalons (possibly fought closer to Troyes than Chalons however), on June 20, 451. The Huns were defeated, and forced to flee back into Italy, which they then began to pillage. Attila died in 453CE, choking to death on his wedding night after passing out from drinking too much alcohol, and his empire fell apart in a civil war amongst his sons, each striving to succeed him.

The remnants of the Huns refromed in south-eastern Europe, ruling over, and intermingling with the Slavs of that region, eventually founding a new empire and becoming known as the Bulgars.

My own Hunnic army is still to small to function on its own in anything more than small scale battles. (Once I get stuck into painting the Late Roman army I have waiting to do, I will put a lot more effort into my forces from this period). They are a very "light weight force", great for fast movement, but not for heavy duty, hand-to-hand fighting.

You have to admit that their leader - the guy with the standard with human skulls hanging of it - looks impressive though!

Unit Of The Week - Revolutionary Wars French Infantry

If the French thought that overthrowing their nobility would solve all their problems in the 1790s, they were soon to get a nasty bump back into the real world.

The monarchs of Europe may have been able to "forgive" the American colonies for throwing off the yoke of the British monarchy - America was thousands of miles away. But when the ordinary people of France brought the revolutionary concepts of liberty, equality and fraternity (brotherhood) to mainland Europe, it was a little too much. Adding to the insult also, was the fact that the (now deposed) French royal family was related to many of the monarchs of Europe, and the need to satisfy family honor was thrown into the mix as well.

Prior to the revolution, the French army had been maintained by the nobility, with nobles holding most of the senior ranks. With the nobility now pushed aside, the French had no real "army" with which to defend themselves. Prussia and Austria were the first to swoop, and the French were forced to quickly put together whatever forces they could to resist the threat.

Initially, these armies were little more than disorganized rabble, who would often turn and run at the sound of the first shots. For the untrained soldier, self preservation soon overcomes any concept of duty!

In response to this, the French began grouping their soldiers together in large units (safety in numbers), with the most experienced men at the rear, with orders to shoot anyone who tried to turn and run. And as leaders with some ability began to emerge, the French gradually began to assemble armies that could hold their own.

Infantry formed the bulk of the French armies of the 1790s, with two main types (although the duties were essentially the same). Line infantry battalions (pictured above with the white trousers) and light infantry battalions (all blue) were led by a major and comprised seven companies of fusiliers (or chasseurs for the light battalions), and one company each of grenadiers (or carabiniers for the light battalions) and voltigeurs. Each company consisted of 140 men.

All were armed with cartridge loading flintlock muskets, although, given the initial shortage of ammunition, it was often only the voltigeurs who were well provided for in this regard.

The voltigeurs typically spread out in advance of the main battalion, chipping away at the enemy with musket fire. At the appointed time, the main battalion, formed up in a dense column, not unlike the ancient Greek phalanx, would charge home, using its numbers to overwhelm the enemy at a selected point in the line.

As the French military machine re-establihsed itself, artillery (thanks, at least in part, to the rise to prominence of a young Corsican gentleman named Napoleon Bonaparte) and cavalry (once the equine-rich German lands had been "pursuaded" into a more friendly relationship with France) also made their presence felt once again.

My own Revolutionary Wars French army has started well with five wins from five outings, but now suddenly finds itself with a leadership crisis, following the untimely death of the general who led them to those successes.

With upcoming battles against my Russians and British planned, they are desparately looking for a new leader to emerge.

Each week (famous last words) I hope to present a different "Unit of the Week", which will look at a different type of soldier from one of the many different armies I have in my collection. I'll give a brief historical outline behind the troops, and introduce any special features or personalities as they relate to my particular table-top army, and any recent battles it may have contested.

Unit of the Week: Russian Hussars (Napoleonic Wars)

While the Cossacks who hounded Napoleon on his retreat from Moscow in 1812 and 1813 may be the best known of the Russian cavalry units, every European army had hussars. And by the Napoleonic era, Russia had regarded itself as part of Europe for a full century.

By 1805, the Russian army had eight regiments of hussars, with a ninth forming part of the impressive Russian Imperial Guard. In the reorganization of 1812, just prior to Napoleon’s invasion, this number had increased to 16, with two regiments in each of the eight cavalry divisions present. A division would typically be led by a knyaz (prince), a regiment by a graf (duke), and an infantry batallion or cavalry squadron by perhaps a baron.

A Russian Light Cavalry (Dragoon, Hussar or Cossack) regiment comprised ten squadrons each of 140 men (7 figures).

The light cavalry (dragoons, hussars, uhlans and cossacks) were primarily intended for reconnaissance, screening, raiding, pursuit and “field security”. Typically their weapons would be a carbine, two pistols and a sword. Carbines would be used for longer range "shoot outs", and if drawn into combat, the hussars would discharge both pistols at close range then turn to their swords.

All Russian cavalry was of very high quality, and man-for-man, was the match of any army in Europe. (The big failing of the Russian army of this era was its leadership, with the junior officers suffering from a lack of education, and the senior officers often more fond of gambling and vodka than matters military).

My regiment of Russian Hussars will be led in 2010 by Graf (Duke) Rostov, who at 61 years of age is one of the older generals in my Russian Napoleonic Wars division. (That's him on the white horse on the right). Straight off the paint shelf, my regiment is still "being raised" and only consists of three of its full 10 squadrons. This won't be a major problem though, as not all squadrons would be sent on campaign anyway. Logistical aspects such as maintaining the home base, recruitment (to replace troops killed in the field), and so on would make it extremely rare for all squadrons of a particular regiment to appear on the field at once. And given the further limits imposed by the size of a wargames table, it will be unusual for more than one or two squadrons to appear in any given table-top battle.

My hussars haven't yet seen any action, however in its two battles to date, both against French armies, my Russians have lived up to their reputation as steady, if somewhat unspectacular, opponents.

Each week (famous last words) I hope to present a different "Unit of the Week", which will look at a different type of soldier from one of the many different armies I have in my collection. I'll give a brief historical outline behind the troops, and introduce any special features or personalities as they relate to my particular table-top army, and any recent battles it may have contested.

Happy New Year!

Well, I reached my goal of having painted 10,000 figures by Jan. 1 2010, and now have a small Early German army with which to challenge my Celts and Romans. (One of the warbands is pictured above).

The actual total now stands at 10,006 figures finished. While I'm happy to have achieved the goal, I won't be setting any similar targets in the near future. It became just a little too much of a high pressure race near the end.

I do still have lots of painting to do, but I'll proceed at a more leaisurely pace from here. Also, I want to devote some of my free time to battles and maybe even some campaigns.

I'll have to see what 2010 can bring.

First Unit of Russian Streltsi Done

I was hoping to get three of these done before the end of the year, but with the (mostly) gloomy days now closing in fast, I doubt I will accomplish that - which means my Russian army from the early 1600s won't be ready in time to fight a campaign against my Swedes as my first "event" of 2010.

These pics don't show the lace on the front of their coats - lots of fiddly detail on these guys, which is why I need good light for painting. I'm using blue, black and white as the main colors for these guys as it gives kind of "icy" look, which goes well with the cold climte they often fought in - especially against the Swedes.

(With these guys done, the count is now 9,930 painted - only 70 more figures to do to reach the 10,000!)

As far as the history behind the unit is concerned......

The streltsi were created by Ivan “The Terrible” in 1550, and were Muscovy’s first standing army. They first saw combat at the Seige of Kazan in 1552.

Initially, they were only 3,000 strong, but grew in numbers and proved themselves effective on the battlefield, quickly becoming an elite force. At their peak, they were the backbone of the Russian armies that fought the Poles, Swedes and Turks, amongst others. As time passed however, they became more concerned with their prestige and influence than military prowess, and by the late 1600s, did not perform well in combat.

Streltsi regiments were divided into companies (sotnia) of 100 and desyatki of 10, with a regiment (prikaz prior to 1681 and later polk) varying in size from 600 to 1,000 men strong, at least in the 1670s. The regiments were named after their colonel (“Chief of prikazi”), and colonels and officers of higher rank had to be nobles, appointed by the government.

(My units will comprise 45 figures, which, using a scale of 1 figure = 20 real men, gives a regimental strength of 900 men, which fits nicely.)

They wore no armour except helmets, while their issued clothing was semi-uniform from an early stage, with regiments wearing different colours, including red, blue and green. Their name meant “musketeer”, and they were armed with the flintlock musket, which remained in use until the end of the 17th century, when it was phased out. They also carried a sabre, and an axe with a crescent blade (bardiche) which also served as a rest for the musket.

In addition to their participation in military operations, streltsi performed general guard duty, and also carried out general police and fire-brigade functions.

The streltsi became a very conservative body, and soon drew the contempt of Tsar Peter “the Great”, who used their attempted revolt in 1698 to massively reduce their numbers and power. By 1710, they barely existed as a force within the Russian army.

Although they existed for over 150 years their appearance did not change greatly for most of that time. They wore a traditional costume of a heavy kaftan-coat with lacing on the chest, plus a fur-trimmed cap and long boots. Over the left shoulder they had a leather belt (berendeyka) which supported the small wooden containers full of powder, plus another powder flask on the right hip. Finally they also had a bullet bag and spare match cord. The officers would be more finely attired, as you might expect.

Between these guys and all the Russian horsemen I've painted up this year, I'm looking forward to seeing how they perform on the battle field - when they finally do make it there!